View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2006, 10:37 PM
Highwayman's Avatar
Highwayman Highwayman is offline
DodgeBoard President
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: God's country
Posts: 5,154
Casino Cash: $35980
Disagrees: 5
Disagreed With 2 Times in 1 Post
Agreed With Other Posts: 133
Members Agreed 88 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by notyoubob
.... But first of all, I have to say I really wish it would have been up to businesses to decide whether to allow smoking or not and not a government. But with that being said:......
I’m glad you said that because that has been my contention all along. Let the business owner decide.

Do some businesses do better with a non-smoking policy? Given that the majority of folks don’t smoke one would think so. If there was really a demand for non-smoking bars and restaurants you would think that the owners would do it on their own. I once stopped at a place for lunch and after seeing the no smoking sign on the door walked to the other side of the parking lot to another place. Could a non-smoker do the same in reverse? Sure they could. If the demand was real the owner that allowed smoking would be looking across the parking lot at his competitor with a full house and seeing his nearly empty place figure it out. He would voluntarily become a non-smoking place to survive and that’s how the free market works.

As for other freedoms being under attack, you’re right. If you notice in many cases the attacks follow the same model as the one that was used against tobacco.
__________________


ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY

Click here to view Democrat’s comments on Iraq and WMD’s
Reply With Quote