View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-19-2006, 03:37 AM
Turiel Turiel is offline
Banned
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
Casino Cash: $1750
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes, I read your definition, your obviously not evolved enough in the english langauge to realize that a statement can be anwsers with a question.

I think your definition is very..well, stupid.
I'm one of those *******'s who think graffiti can be art, yes I know bad me.
But the idea that art has to have permission to exist is insane.
If Dali had done "swans reflecting elephants" on the top of some moron's car without permission it would still be art. Art is concerned with creation, not the legal standing of real estate ownership.

Last edited by Turiel; 08-19-2006 at 04:00 AM..
Reply With Quote