Thread: No Due Process, NO Development Plan, No Problem
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:37 AM
lurker's Avatar
lurker lurker is offline
DodgeBoard Senior VP
  
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,396
Casino Cash: $2430
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 1120
lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!
lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!lurker Is off the scale!
I read that guest editorial as I was re-covering the bird cage floor. Valid points... all of them were valid.

It's too bad the author(s) of the county zoning regulations didn't include definitions such as Davis California included in their "Municipal Code" ...

Quote:
Shall, May.* "Shall" is mandatory and "may" is permissive.


*For similar state law, see Gov. C., § .14
Can you copy the editorial on this thread?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by wordsmythe View Post
Damn YOU for making me agree in public with you.

But when you're right you're right.


"Wal-Mart, you may want to look into this."
Reply With Quote