Quote:
Originally Posted by Army_of_One  If the market will let them sell their premium product for a higher price and they can still move that product then I guess the market forces have an impact on that. As far as moving the company to China and paying the workers 2.50 instead of 13.00 and more than likely less taxes and benefits paid also...increases their profit, minus what it takes to ship the stuff back to the U.S. to be sold. Lets see...a business increasing their profits...Sounds like they are using globalization to increase their profits. Is that a bad thing? |
So, the way I read it in your response....It's a very bad thing that the liberal workers unions want their share of the big profits, in the form of higher wages. But it is perfectly fine for the CEO's and Board of Director's to be even more greedy as to do away with the unions completely and take their factories overseas.
My question to you is, why is it such a bad thing to share the wealth throughout the whole company instead of just the CEO and Board of Directors? If the workers build a product that consumers like and make the company very popular in the way of high sales of their products, shouldn't they be included in the rewards of making the company very profitable?
With your way of thinking, all of the NFL and NBA team owners should fire all their overpaid American talent and move their teams overseas and fill their team rosters with foreigners from their new "home" countries. The team owners would then make all the profit while crapping on the players who made their sports popular in the first place. Would you still watch the games?