Quote:
Originally Posted by TexKan  I don't know how to do that multi quote thing - but - is the problem that the law only covers "state" property and buildings? Perhaps the law was written that way so the cities could write thier own - ya know ho folks hate to have the "state" make thier decisions for them! - So with that in mind the "state" passed the law with the knowldege that cities were responsible for designating thier own sites that are considered off limits. My question is - IF you are so concerned that you can't carry in city hall - why not the same concern for the state capitol????? What's the point?????? Why is it OK for the state and not the city??? | I guess you haven't been reading other posts in the thread very good. This was the second time I posted this. Maybe third time is a charm.  Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba That is why this is so important....
A law that gives Kansans the right to carry concealed weapons needs protection from local governments that are passing ordinances adding their own restrictions on gun owners, a state senator says.
A bill proposed by Sen. Phil Journey, R-Haysville, would prohibit cities from placing additional regulations on the state's concealed carry law passed in 2006. The bill also would void any regulations already passed by cities regarding concealed carry within their jurisdictions.
Please email your senator and tell him you support the bill by the Sen. Journey. |
__________________
Politicians are like diapers, they both need changed occasionally for the same reason.
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
The hard work of one will do more than the prayer of millions. |