View Single Post
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2007, 07:05 PM
lurker's Avatar
lurker lurker is offline
DodgeBoard Senior VP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,416
Casino Cash: $2970
Blog Entries: 1
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wordsmythe View Post
So you're saying that if I'm a terrible driver and I keep causing accidents that kill or harm people that it's OK for me to keep driving as long as I can keep insurnace to pay for the damages?

See I don't think the city should have to pay ANYTHING to this person. It's the same as if you are breaking into my house and you get hurt on something and sue me - in that instance you should NOT be able to collect damages against me eve if I'm grossly negligent. If you are breaking the law you give up those rights.

This guy was running from the cops and so he made that choice.

If he would have taken out someone who had nothing to do with it then the cops and he should pay the damages.

Cops pursuing, at high speeds, someone for a traffic violation are showing off how badass they think they are.
Ya had me until the last line, then you waffled....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by wordsmythe View Post
Damn YOU for making me agree in public with you.

But when you're right you're right.


"Wal-Mart, you may want to look into this."
Reply With Quote