Quote:
Originally Posted by flange  I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on each of those quotes because I'm far too lazy to actually verify each of them. So, cool, lots of known liberals/Democrats also thought Saddam's pursuit of WMDs was a threat.
Now, what about the rest of Bush's garbage?
Hurricane Katrina
NSA's Warrant-less Wiretaps
Complete disregard for the Geneva Conventions
Scooter Libby
Alberto Gonzalez and the Federal Prosecutors
Where are your quotes regarding that crap? I seriously can't believe anyone is defending Bush anymore. There are some good Republicans out there, but Bush is not one of them. My wife, who voted for Bush both times, doesn't understand why he hasn't been impeached yet. This guy's presidency is a complete disaster. |
We will ignore the fact that WMD's have been found, and in somewhat large quantities in Iraq, it's convenient for the news cycle to ignore that or disregard it as un-important. We can also ignore that Abu Nidal, Abu Sayaff and other terrorist notables, even Official State sponsoring of suicide bombers occured inside of IRaq pre-war. We will ignore the fact that Nagin refused a forced evacuation until 24 hours prior to Landfall of Katrina(or that other Hurricanes took even longer to get a response under Clinton). We will also ignore that Scooter was convicted of lying and not the actual crime, (which Fitzy will never actually charge anybody with due to lack of evidence, because the so called under cover agent was never undercover and was proud to say so at social gatherings) , not that Clinton ever did that, we will also ignore that Janet Reno fired each and every one of the Federal Prosecutors when she was in office(98 was the total). See news and history has taught me that it matters that if it's a Democrat in office, because when they are accused of a crime it is nothing but a smear campaign by the Republicans. When it's a Republican in Office he is officially guilty until proven innocent, and if he is innocent it is a cover up.