Quote:
Originally Posted by TexKan  WHAT??? That's insane! Unless he was supposed to have the car back and didn't. This just sounds all wrong. Somethin is missin.
On another note - did they ticket this guy? Is the police report on the accident or the expired / non esistant tags on vehicles? Ya need to stay focused on the issue - your car is damaged cause of him suposedly. Harrasin him over shit on his property or anything else won't help your car get fixed. Besides............ it's evil in itself to seek revenge rather than just plain justice. |
The tags he had when he wrecked into me were dealership tags so no tickets were given. It irks me that the owner of the dealership doesn't want to fix my car because they feel he shouldn't have been driving around on those dealership tags (she the owner said that was his blazer and he was responsible for getting his own plates and insurance) , yet he's had a few other dealership tags on that blazer, and a truck that has recently appeared w/ the dealership tags... If the owner is so concerned than why is he still driving around w/ their tags??
Something is missing, or I should say not adding up. Their ins doesn't want to pay because his name is not on the insurance, yet it was a dealership tag from where he works. Owner doesn't want to pay because he (guy who ran into me) was supposed to be trading his vehicle off for the blazer (the one that hit me) but no papers were drawn up yet. sooooooooooooooo what all that tells me is that since no papers were drawn up the blazer was still the dealerships, since he was driving their vehicle w/ their dealership plates, their responsible (according to me) but for some odd reason their insurance doesn't see it that way.