
07-19-2007, 09:21 PM
|
 | DodgeBoard President | | Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: God's country
Posts: 5,149
Casino Cash: $35910
Disagrees: 5
Disagreed With 2 Times in 1 Post
Agreed With Other Posts: 131
Members Agreed 83 Times in 43 Posts
| |
| Democrats cut ‘John Doe’ provision Making the world safer for terrorists in the pursuit of political correctness the Democrats prove to be straw men in the Land of Oz. Quote:
July 19, 2007
By Audrey Hudson - Congressional Democrats today failed to include a provision in homeland security legislation that would protect the public from being sued for reporting suspicious behavior that may lead to a terrorist attack, according to House Republican leaders.
"This is a slap in the face of good citizens who do their patriotic duty and come forward, and it caves in to radical Islamists," said Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Republicans wanted the provision included in final legislation, crafted yesterday during a House and Senate conference committee, that will implement final recommendations from the September 11 commission.
Mr. King and Rep. Steve Pearce, New Mexico Republican, sponsored the provision after a group of Muslim imams filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against US Airways and unknown "John Doe" passengers. The imams were removed from US Airways Flight 300 on Nov. 20 after fellow passengers on the Minneapolis-to-Phoenix flight complained about the imams' suspicious behavior.
On March 27, the House approved the "John Doe" amendment on a 304-121 vote.
"Democrats are trying to find any technical excuse to keep immunity out of the language of the bill to protect citizens, who in good faith, report suspicious activity to police or law enforcement," Mr. King said. "I don't see how you can have a homeland security bill without protecting people who come forward to report suspicious activity."...
| Democrats cut 'John Doe' provision*-*Nation/Politics*-*The Washington Times, America's Newspaper |