View Single Post
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 09-25-2007, 01:32 PM
Reddemons54's Avatar
Reddemons54 Reddemons54 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 122
Casino Cash: $4358
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Reddemons54 Send a message via MSN to Reddemons54 Send a message via Yahoo to Reddemons54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detector View Post
Is Archeology not a branch of science? Is history not a branch of science?

I believe science is more a method used in many fields rather than a specific field.



Tell me the bible has nothing of interest to Archeology. Can you not examine, test, and verify places of the bible?

By politically correct I was referring to how anything stamped religious has no place in science. To that I say BS. Its simply politics.
History to me is not a branch of science. Archaeology, possibly, but I think that is even pushing it. About the only thing scientific about archaeology is its dating methods, IMO.
Reply With Quote