View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-08-2007, 11:32 AM
lurker's Avatar
lurker lurker is offline
DodgeBoard Senior VP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,408
Casino Cash: $2980
Blog Entries: 1
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 4 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman View Post
I’m waiting for the lawsuits to start against business that ban individuals their right to self-defense and then fail to provide real protections for their clientele.
Without a doubt, Highwayman's got a dead aim on this one.

The State has said that qualified C-C folks have a right to carry and various government owned properties prohibit C-C. Where the governemt prohibits C-C, they shoulder the responsibility of protecting....

When a business prohibits C-C, the business also shoulders the responsibility. The sign on the door is much like the "Beware of doG" sign... both acknowledge the potential for a problem.

The presence of the sign WITHOUT providing a physical search of all who enter CAN be construed as a failure to provide due diligence.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by wordsmythe View Post
Damn YOU for making me agree in public with you.

But when you're right you're right.


"Wal-Mart, you may want to look into this."
Reply With Quote