Quote:
Originally Posted by banyon  It's implied, throughout the tone of Mr. Lott's article.
He is saying (admittedly indirectly) that the current law isn't good enough. He doesn't advocate any kind of boycott campaign or anything. |
I see what you are looking at now. Thanks.
It is indirect. So much so that I didn’t read into it the same thing that you did.
I personally don’t advocate forcing a private business to change by law. But I’m all for boycotts and more media exposure about the benefits and risks of a no guns policy.