View Single Post
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 12-10-2007, 03:00 PM
Value Pack Value Pack is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 214
Casino Cash: $6625
Disagrees: 4
Disagreed With 2 Times in 1 Post
Agreed With Other Posts: 7
Members Agreed 38 Times in 11 Posts
The Sign, if we are to believe the Kansas Attorney General, only does the following:

Question: (from the website of Ks Attorney General)

"Can business owners restrict the concealed carry of firearms by Licensees through posting their property?"

Answer: Yes. However, as per K.S.A. 75-7c11 (as amended by H.B. 2528, published May 3, 2007 in Kansas Register Vol. 26, No. 18, p. 666) private business owners as well as city, county, or political subdivisions may only restrict the concealed carry of firearms within the building or buildings of that entity.

As I read this, the rifle could still be carried into the business, but the owner and/or any employee could ask that person to leave if the business did not like that.

When USD 443 put up their "Gun-free Zone" signs, they added the words "This includes concealed carry" These signs cost extra, and if one is to go strictly by the AG office's requirement was both unnecessary and by adding the extra wording may compromise them in a court of law.
Reply With Quote