View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 09:37 AM
midgetlover's Avatar
midgetlover midgetlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 149
Casino Cash: $230
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Actually, it isn't off topic. When the insurance was brought up it was meant that if you let your kids out streetside and they get hit by an uninsured driver, guess who would foot the bill!!! So, yes it does matter if the driver has insurance.
It wasnt meant for it to be taken as "insurance doesnt matter" but in the whole scheme does it really matter if the driver has insurance when we can prevent it to begin with by taking the time to think safely and make sure our kids come home safe another day thats all.

Insurance isnt the issue, its why would some parents remove their children streetside when it is the safest route to remove them curbside. I sure am not going to be concerned if the car driving towards me has insurance im worried about whether they are going to hit me or my child.

So to sum it up there is no reason to be concerned if the oncoming traffic has insured drivers if we dont put ourselves in a position to think about it period. Park streetside with a child on board remove child curbside and that should the law.
Reply With Quote