View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-22-2007, 11:15 AM
spike52's Avatar
spike52 spike52 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Somewhere in Jersey, hiding from the taxman..
Posts: 268
Casino Cash: $30
Rep Power: 482
spike52 Is off the scale!
spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!spike52 Is off the scale!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman View Post
I take it from that response that you approve of elected officials bad mouthing the troops in a public forum.

If our military did anything wrong there are proper channels to deal with it. A politician making accusations for political gain isn’t one of them.
I take it from our response you can't answer my question...
The youtube clip you posted is humorous right wing proganda.
Sorta like the link in your sig..


This is NOT the first time therm term "cleansing" has been used in referring to Iraq. You knew that right Highway???

Joe Christoff
G.O.A.
10/30/2997
“You know, we look at the attack data going down, but it’s not taking into consideration that there might be fewer attacks because you have ethnically cleansed neighborhoods, particularly in the Baghdad area. It’s produced 2.2 million refugees that have left, and it’s produced 2 million internally displaced persons within the country as well.”
Mr. Speaker, we must remember that the justification for the surge and the justification for the Bush military strategy in Iraq has always been to foster Iraqi political reconciliation. And there is precious little evidence of any such thing."


Source:
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-s...ort_103007.pdf


Now, could other words have been used??
Sure.
But, what Christoff & Moran are saying is that because we have segregated the Sunni & Shiite in Baghdad, (temporarily quelling the civil war) there is less violence.
They're not saying OUR TROOPS ARE COMMITTING GENOCIDE..

Got it????
Reply With Quote