Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike B.  Clueless,
As most everyone knows I'm not a big supporter of a casino in my back yard, but I've always said, "some good things will come from it."
Has Dodge City Resorts suggested that wnd pick up the bill for the arena(s)? What's the difference between that (if it's true) and wnd building a sec with Butler? (I'm just talking facility, not what type of facility)
Will the city and county endorse two proposals just to stay away from looking like they favor one (the local boys) and not the other? How will the lottery look at that decision? (if they look at it at all)
I think the growth in revenue and positive tax benefits will come from the casino, not the facility that is attached!
Are you sure you're not related to Jeff Thorp?  |
1) I think you should look for an agreement that will cover building or operating, or some combination, of a 'facility'(s)
2) I believe the City-County (one or both) will endorse both unless a problem surfaces. No one knows how Lottery will look at anything. The last word on selection will come from the new Review Committee. In their meeting last week they made it clear they will look hard at every applicant.
3) I can agree - but long-term, I think the largest growth in revenues, employment and property tax benefits will come from retail development surrounding the Casino site. The 'facility' can be a positive too, depending upon who it attracts.
4) I talked with him before answering your post.