View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2005, 05:05 AM
Bubba's Avatar
Bubba Bubba is offline
DodgeBoard Senior VP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dodge City
Posts: 4,709
Casino Cash: $3533061
Disagrees: 12
Disagreed With 3 Times in 2 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 94
Members Agreed 138 Times in 72 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to Bubba
‘Birthright citizenship’ debate set to begin

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10609068/

NEW YORK - A proposal to change long-standing federal policy and deny citizenship to babies born to illegal immigrants on U.S. soil ran aground this month in Congress, but it is sure to resurface — kindling bitter debate even if it fails to become law.
At issue is “birthright citizenship” — provided for since the Constitution’s 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868.
Section 1 of that amendment, drafted with freed slaves in mind, says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.”
Some conservatives in Congress, as well as advocacy groups seeking to crack down on illegal immigration, say the amendment has been misapplied over the years, that it was never intended to grant citizenship automatically to babies of illegal immigrants. Thus they contend that federal legislation, rather than a difficult-to-achieve constitutional amendment, would be sufficient to end birthright citizenship.
House bill dies without vote
With more than 70 co-sponsors, Georgia Republican Rep. Nathan Deal tried to include a revocation of birthright citizenship in an immigration bill passed by the House in mid-December. GOP House leaders did not let the proposal come to a vote....
__________________


Politicians are like diapers, they both need changed occasionally for the same reason.


Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"


The hard work of one will do more than the prayer of millions.
Reply With Quote