Quote:
Originally Posted by 88-31-10  Me thinks we'd have 4,000+ fewer dead and billions more dollars to spend fighting terrorism.
Now I'd like for you to explain why we went there and what harm did Saddam cause the U.S. after Gulf War I? If you can't explain it, then extrapolate it or something. | We can argue this point all night long. I can pull up all the past threads for and against going to war with Iraq with all the evidence. I don't have time to do all of that tonight...but this topic has been exhausted on here. Some people believe Iraq is better off and some don't. No matter what evidence for or against the war was presented it would likely be ignored because people have formed their opinion.
If i produced some secret document showing that saddam HAD WMD...you would find a way or a reason to discount it because of your hatred for Bush. On the flipside you could show me something that says there was no WMD found I would tell you I don't believe that and based on conversations I have had with military people that Saddam did have wmd. Hell....most of congress believed he had them...but lets not beat that horse...it's dead and bloated.
__________________
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process..............." Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
LIBERALISM
The haunting fear someone, somewhere can help themselves. |