Quote:
Originally Posted by old timer  then the events center. That would share the costs.
First issues, first. The decision of suddently moving the location of the events center to cover the costs of a casino which had the chair of CFAB as a board member, not public information at the time. That is a different issue. Starks should be off of CFAB, if not in court.
The location pushed by Starks, et al., is a water and sewer nightmare location. The costs of infrastructure doubled.
Thus the casino should pay one half of it all. That would be fair. They plan on making millions of dollars. |
OT,
Half? I think you're being kinda generous. I'd say make 'em pay 100% of their infrastructure cost. And let the SEC and city tap into them.
__________________
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." -Thomas Jefferson
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
-Thomas Jefferson |