Quote:
Originally Posted by Highwayman  I’d like to hear from one of the folks familiar with rules of evidence if having a gunsmith fit a replacement bolt would be considered tampering with evidence or not. Perhaps it’s not allowed.
Either way I don’t think it will constitute negligence on the part of the investigators and the lack of ballistics probably will hold up under appeal. |
Thanks Highwayman, for not being judgmental. you've spoke your opinion but have not been hateful about it. I respect that.
I have no clue as to what would hold up in court and what wouldn't.
I'm trying to figure this thing out myself.
Thanks again!