| Banyon i addressed the most inconsistent part of the KBI's evidence, which was means.
The weapon used was never proven to be a 270. They had pictures of a bolt (they say), however those were damaged. How convient. Even without the bolt they still could have fired the weapon for ballastics.
They could have analyzed the 2 bullet framents for composition, to determine if the bullet found was consistent with the 270 bullet. There are many tests the could have ran, and maybe they did.
At the end of the day, no evidence was shown in court that a 270 rifle was the weapon used.
They found 3 shell casings. 1 was found in the puzzle box, the other 2 were found in the trash along with a 3rd, which was not immediately identified.
Incidently, the 3 other shells, they were found in the trash with the shoes. No live 270 ammunition shells were found, they have pictures of other ammo in a closet.
So, he went to the house, fired 3 shots, went back home, threw 2 shells in the trash with the shoes and kept the 3rd in a puzzle box.
I can understand 1 shot being dismissed by neighbors, but 3 shots, i don't think so.
To many inconsistencies concerning the 270 being the weapon.
The winchester 270 is a high powered rifle used to bring down deer.
Had a 270 being used, seems to me it would have left a big mess.
There was an entrance wound and no exit. Judging from the backyard, the distance couldn't have been more than 30 feet.
This is my last post, which will make quite a few of you happy, but to the ones who expressed support for my opinions, thank you.  |