Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigre  So you agree that it was "circumtantial" proof?
Everything from the bullet to the gun was entered into evidence eventhough they didn't prove that the bullet came from that gun. There was no balistic report but the pictures of the round were entered into evidence (your wrong Banyon) They didn't prove that it was infact a 270 rifle that was used. Infact they were looking for a smaller caliber weapon initially. |
Huh? I don't think I ever claimed there was a ballistic report or proof that it came from the same gun. All I said was that they did enter the .270 rifle into evidence. I believe someone did testify it was consistent with, though not definitively from the same gun.