View Single Post
  #266 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:22 PM
spike52's Avatar
spike52 spike52 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Somewhere in Jersey, hiding from the taxman..
Posts: 355
Casino Cash: $13347
Disagrees: 0
Disagreed With 0 Times in 0 Posts
Agreed With Other Posts: 0
Members Agreed 16 Times in 13 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wordsmythe View Post
The operator reads the machine and gives an opinion based on what they see. If the machine doesn't show indications that would change the operator's opinion then you've fooled the machine AND the operator.

It's not that people are fooling the machine, more like the machines & measurements are not reliable.
Because of the unreliabilty, the courts & the scientific community, are hesitant to acknowledge it.
Why?
Because the tests could indicate innocent people as showing deception.
It's not an exact science like prints or DNA.

When you have time read United States v. Sheffer..
Reply With Quote