| |
| ||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Boardroom The place for administration to make announcements concerning the board. You may post here as well. |
| View Poll Results: How to you think we should proceed with reputation system? | |||
| I like the new thanks/spanks system |     | 21 | 41.18% |
| I still would like the old reputation system back as it was |    | 4 | 7.84% |
| I would like to have no reputation system and no spanks/thanks system |    | 7 | 13.73% |
| I would like the old reputaion system back, but with changes that remove anonymity |    | 19 | 37.25% |
| Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
08-26-2008, 05:03 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| POLL: Reputation revisited So, you have all had a couple of weeks to regroup and fully test the post thanks/post spanks reputation alternative. What do you think? Do you like it better? Have you seen any problems with it? Now's your opportunity to put in your 2 cents. Personally, I haven't received a single nasty email about an unsigned negative reputation comment. For me, it's been great. The important thing is, how do you feel? Note: This is a public poll.     |
|
08-26-2008, 05:09 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| I think it's great for a "feel good" tool if that is what you want. I believe the Reputation system was designed to give people negative rep for people making rude posts or such. This is supposed to be a self policing board but the spanking doesn't allow that. |
| The Following 3 Users Agree With Army_of_One On This Post: | ||
|
08-26-2008, 06:16 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| You know it's funny....I had a very high rep score pertaining to my posts in the past. I have only been thanked four times on this new system. I think I like the rep system better because I got much better feedback from my posts than I do now; however that is a way to say, hey pootsy, I will give you a good rep and I will stick up for you and your posts, but not let everyone know I approve. Now the thank/spank system is different. Everyone knows who is thanking and spanking, so it is turning into sort of a popularity game, as the rep system was more confidentual. Does this make sense? Another thing though, the rep system gave people the opportunity to say things that they did not want to say in forum, as it might make them be less liked or to not cause friction. This was a good and a bad thing, as if they could say it in rep, they should say it in forum. I do like spanking Army though, and I might like to spank others so I do like spanking 
__________________ People too weak to follow their own dreams will usually try to find a way to discourage yours............... |
| The Following 3 Users Agree With pootsy On This Post: | ||
|
08-26-2008, 06:29 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
|
| The Following 2 Users Disagree with Army_of_One For This Disagreeable Post: | ||
Made in the USA (08-27-2008), pootsy (08-26-2008) | ||
|
08-26-2008, 07:07 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| I like the spank/thanks because it's open, everyone can see who agrees/disagrees with what, we don't have the "complaints" about so and so said this in reps or did this but said that in open forum. However I also like the reps because it allows comments as to why you agree or disagree. I'm torn! LOL |
| The Following 2 Users Agree With 357 mag On This Post: | ||
jeezeweeze (08-27-2008), pootsy (08-26-2008) | ||
|
08-26-2008, 07:12 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Neither. They don't help police the board at all. I think the neg. rep was used once to run someone out at the very beginning that everyone, i guess, didn't like from the old board. After that it became a popularity contest and became a big shoulder patting circle. With this, spanks/thanks feature you get to see who support and who don't support a post. Although the feature is a little childish with what is suppose to be--the "spanks" isn't used as it seems it should have been intended to be....refrence a couple posts before this and others in other threads. To put it simple: We don't need no stinkin rep system
__________________ There is no pleasure in having nothing to do; the fun is having lots to do and not doing it. Andrew Jackson |
| The Following User Agrees With The Drifter On This Post: | ||
Army_of_One (08-27-2008) | ||
|
08-26-2008, 07:36 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| I was torn on which way to vote. I do kinda like the current spanks/thanks system, but I liked the old rep system too. So I ask... can we keep both, with the user having to option to disable one or the other or both?
__________________ Cannons don't sink ships, Pirates with Cannons sink ships. "The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life." - Teddy Roosevelt |
| The Following User Agrees With SGT T. On This Post: | ||
pootsy (08-26-2008) | ||
|
08-26-2008, 07:56 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| But Drifter I like to spank!! SGT T, you have the best idea!!! Yay!!
__________________ People too weak to follow their own dreams will usually try to find a way to discourage yours............... |
|
08-26-2008, 08:14 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| I see that and it brings down the purpose of the feature. Maybe one that says "agree" or "disagree" would be better.
__________________ There is no pleasure in having nothing to do; the fun is having lots to do and not doing it. Andrew Jackson |
| The Following User Agrees With The Drifter On This Post: | ||
TheWizzard (08-27-2008) | ||
|
08-26-2008, 08:29 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Quote:
__________________  ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY Click here to view Democrat’s comments on Iraq and WMD’s |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Linear Mode
