![]() | ![]() |
| ||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| City & County Politics Let us know how our city/county elected officials are doing. National politics should be posted in the Politics and Religion forum. You must JOIN to see political forums. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ "Wal-Mart, you may want to look into this." |
| ||||
| There are plenty of sucess stories in Louisanna. They don't have major airports - when you are talking ONE casino type operation - they don't come in on Lear Jets........ busses will do and the money and improvements will follow - I think. It's bound to be better than the slope Dodge is on now. What can it hurt? I know all about the evils and cost of casinos what I'm talkin about is Dodge was willing to take a chance on the meat packing business and supported it. Why in the world is it so hard to support a different type of business that has shown to be much more successful and positive than the meat packers turned out to be? Packers bring in money but they forgot to tell ya about the drawbacks of the industry............. so why is Dodge so scared of casinos???? How much worse can it be? It might actually get ya out of the dirty dusty town Dodge has become. What ya got to lose?
__________________ Kicked back in Texas - still payin those Kansas taxes...... The old believe everything, the middle aged suspect everything, the young know everything......... Oscar Wilde |
| ||||
| Don't forget that Dodge City was named one of the top 50 places in the United States to visit by the National Bus Tours Association. There was a story about it in the Globe a month or so ago. The CVB works very hard at getting bus tours to come to Dodge (or to stop for a day and night on their way to somewhere else). A casino would only help. |
| ||||
| NBTA stands for National Bus Tours Association?? I thought it was the National Bull$hit Testers Academy------------- WEll, ya learn something everyday! |
| |||
| When this topic was started,in my first paragraph I stated 73 per cent of the voters were against building the Special Event Center in Wright Park Area. From all the post and information that I have seen, it appears they intend to TRY and build the Motel, Casino, and Event Center or a Convention Center in the same general area again. My questions are, Why do we have a very small group of people that do what they want even if they know it will not work. We have one group that wants a Event Center, another group wants a Convention Center, still another group wants something that would be like the 3-I show. It would appear that if you are going to invest several million dollars you would not want to lock yourself in an area with Grain Elevator, Rail Road tracks, small streets, unless some one will make a killing from the property the City will need to purchase. How do you feel about the Location? |
| ||||
| Well, I'm not a voter, but I have an opinion.... When it was decided a new city pool couldn't be located in Wright Park because of location, parking, etc., etc., etc., there was not a lot of support for the other location. So now why the sudden interest in building a new building in Wright Park. All the old problems are still there with a few additional ones. Is that the best face the city can put forward for it's convention/activity visitors? Or is it a place the city already owns property and is trying to make use of it? So put the building in Wright Park. It's not going to be convenient to lodging or restaurants there. Or are they going to sell park property to private investors for that? And about the streets around there. Uck! Besides the events center, there's gonna be some huge bills to pay to get DC ready.
__________________ When the goin' gets tough, the tough go shopping! |
| ||||
| The Wright Park area should not be the location of any of the projects. That was decided by a vast majority of voters. The SEC, should be just that a Special Events Center, not a convention center, not a 3-i type building. But a special events center, that would seat between 7000-10000 people for special events like concerts, monster truck shows, indoor rodeos, large circus shows (not the small ones the shriners bring to Dodge now), there should be the ability to have ice on the arena floor to bring in Ice Capades type shows. If they are just going to build a convention center or a 3-i building, they might as well not build it because it will be doomed for failure, casino or not.
__________________ Politicians are like diapers, they both need changed occasionally for the same reason. Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist" The hard work of one will do more than the prayer of millions. |
| ||||
| Strobel also said it's extremely unlikely under normal circumstances that sales tax collections would fail to meet projections. But if they did, the city and county would not be legally obligated to cover the shortfall by raising property taxes because the only collateral for sales tax bonds is sales tax revenue. He said the city and county could take another approach to dealing with the shortfall, such as extending the repayment period or using bond reserve accounts. "But the bottom line is, they don't go on property taxes," he said. This was published in the Globe on March 29th, 2005. I agree with Ken Stroble. A loss of sales tax from Ford County does not mean a property tax increase to make up the shortfall. We can repeal the County's sales tax for WND projects without fear of property tax increases. Maybe it's time to re-evaluate if the SEC even needs a convention center included. The casino vote passed and that facility will have a convention cernter. Do we need two convention centers in Dodge City? We can save tax payers alot of money by rejecting or modifying the County's and City agreement with Global. |
| ||||
| The repeal vote date has been postponed. The vote to repeal the County's sales tax (1/2%) was set for July 24th. But since Mr. Dalton wanted a Judge, once agian, Mr. Innes, to decide if property tax would increase if the repeal was a success, we'll wait for Mr. Innes to make a decision. He is scheduled to hear oral arguments on July 18th from the City's legal counsel, the County's legal counsel and Mr. Dalton. I agree with the decision to postpone the vote. It'll give people time to find out that property tax will not have to pick up the bill for the City and County's failure to do what should have been done along time ago! Oh well, that's water under the bridge now. I guess we'll just have to wait, once again, for someone outside of our community to decide for US what WE can and can not do! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |

