Tahah being charged with 1st Degree murder!

[spike52]

Originally Posted by wordsmythe

When I start taking orders from you I'll let you know.

*off topic*


Sounds good.
I'll watch for the memo.



You keep hating, I'll keep laughing....

[banyon]

Originally Posted by spike52

What contention?
Why would the prosecutor introduce any evidence regarding a murder weapon that he could not confirm, nor refute?
What do you do for a living????????


p.s. WTE...when the bad guy confesses to killing someone with say a .270 rifle, and he has the exact same caliber rifle in his home, but you have zero capability to be match ballistics, you DO NOT enter this info. into evidence.

Technically they did introduce the rifle into evidence. The fact that it is the same caliber and that the rounds from it were stored in the box are circumstantial proof (along with all of the other evidence) that he did the deed. The County Attorney held the rifle over his head and shook it around in closing arguments.

[spike52]

Originally Posted by banyon

Technically they did introduce the rifle into evidence. The fact that it is the same caliber and that the rounds from it were stored in the box are circumstantial proof (along with all of the other evidence) that he did the deed. The County Attorney held the rifle over his head and shook it around in closing arguments.

Yes, the rifle, but not any ballistics regarding it, nor the round from the body.
Correct?

[banyon]

Originally Posted by spike52

Yes, the rifle, but not any ballistics regarding it, nor the round from the body.
Correct?

Yes, that's right.

[Tigre]

Originally Posted by banyon

Technically they did introduce the rifle into evidence. The fact that it is the same caliber and that the rounds from it were stored in the box are circumstantial proof (along with all of the other evidence) that he did the deed. The County Attorney held the rifle over his head and shook it around in closing arguments.

So you agree that it was "circumtantial" proof?

Everything from the bullet to the gun was entered into evidence eventhough they didn't prove that the bullet came from that gun. There was no balistic report but the pictures of the round were entered into evidence (your wrong Banyon) They didn't prove that it was infact a 270 rifle that was used. Infact they were looking for a smaller caliber weapon initially.

They did "Flying Dutchman" tell him they had found the bolt. In the same closet as the gun. I don't know about you but if I was trying to hide something I wouldn't put it in the same closet that I kept the guns in.

I don't know what happened.....I don't know why someone would confess if they didn't do it other than he had already been served paper saying that he was being investigated for second degree murder and everyone as far as he was concerned thought he had done it.

There is a lot of inconsistancies that I would like to know and I'm sure in due time we will all know.

I know none of you on this board had anything to do with him getting convicted but you sure were quick to jump on the bandwagon to say he did it without a shadow of a doubt.

[Bubba]

Originally Posted by Tigre

...I know none of you on this board had anything to do with him getting convicted but you sure were quick to jump on the bandwagon to say he did it without a shadow of a doubt.

That is because innocent people don't run!

[Highwayman]

Originally Posted by spike52

Yes, the rifle, but not any ballistics regarding it, nor the round from the body.
Correct?

Originally Posted by banyon

Yes, that's right.

Was there an intact bullet recovered?

Often a small high velocity round like that will shatter on impact.

[357 mag]

Originally Posted by Tigre

So you agree that it was "circumtantial" proof?

Everything from the bullet to the gun was entered into evidence eventhough they didn't prove that the bullet came from that gun. There was no balistic report but the pictures of the round were entered into evidence (your wrong Banyon) They didn't prove that it was infact a 270 rifle that was used. Infact they were looking for a smaller caliber weapon initially.

They did "Flying Dutchman" tell him they had found the bolt. In the same closet as the gun. I don't know about you but if I was trying to hide something I wouldn't put it in the same closet that I kept the guns in.

I don't know what happened.....I don't know why someone would confess if they didn't do it other than he had already been served paper saying that he was being investigated for second degree murder and everyone as far as he was concerned thought he had done it.

There is a lot of inconsistancies that I would like to know and I'm sure in due time we will all know.

I know none of you on this board had anything to do with him getting convicted but you sure were quick to jump on the bandwagon to say he did it without a shadow of a doubt.

You know it's funny... You keep saying he was served with papers saying he was being investigated for murder, they don't serve you papers unless charges are filed, and last I knew the charges weren't filed until after he was arrested in Colorado. He was told he was a suspect and was set for a lie detector test that Thursday and he ran because he knew he couldn't pass it.

[spike52]

Originally Posted by Highwayman

Was there an intact bullet recovered?

I'm not sure.

[Tee]

Originally Posted by 357 mag

You know it's funny... You keep saying he was served with papers saying he was being investigated for murder, they don't serve you papers unless charges are filed, and last I knew the charges weren't filed until after he was arrested in Colorado. He was told he was a suspect and was set for a lie detector test that Thursday and he ran because he knew he couldn't pass it.

Lie detectors are easy to fool, if A) you are a pathological liar, B) you know how to employ countermeasures.