Go Back   DodgeBoard.com - Forums > Chit Chat > Longbranch Saloon
Home Forums Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Longbranch Saloon This is a special area for hot topics, duels and heated discussions. WARNING- Enter at your own risk. This is a free-fire zone.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2006, 06:18 PM
Bubba's Avatar
DodgeBoard Senior VP
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dodge City
Posts: 4,309
Casino Cash: $3533366
Rep Power: 1851
Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!
Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!Bubba Is off the scale!
Send a message via Yahoo to Bubba
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexKan
Gee ya'll are smart!!.............


My majority Bubba -

100% = all the votes (even tho it was only prob 30% of reg. voters to begin with)

48 + 45+ 17 = 110....... now we ALL know we aint gettin 110 pennies or percent out of ANY politician.......... no matter what the party!!

So here ya go:

Clinton - 48% (if you say so)

Losers - 52%

More folks liked the losers as a group than they did the alternative....... Clinton needs 51% to get a majority......... but remember the very very small percent of folks that vote anyway........ that's why there's so much discontentment.......... easier to bitch than vote.........
So math isn't my strong point!

I can see your point if there were only two. But if there are three or more you have to seperate it further. By the way, I didn't say Clinton for a reason, I even went as far as saying him/her in the example. My scenario would work no matter who got the votes either in the past or in the future.

Let me fix my math and also look at your example.

Candidate 1 = 48%

Candidate 2 = 52%

Using an example of your scenario candidate 2 has the majority of the votes.


Using more than two candidates.

Candidate 1 = 48%

Candidate 2 = 35%

Candidate 3 = 17%

Using this scenario, candidate 1 has the majority of the votes. How do I come to this conclusion?

#1-48%>#2-35%
#1-48%>#3-17%

Comparing candidate 1's total to both #2 and #3 he/she clearly had more votes than either of the other candidates. More still means majority.
__________________


Politicians are like diapers, they both need changed occasionally for the same reason.


Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant" is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"


The hard work of one will do more than the prayer of millions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2006, 07:15 PM
TexKan's Avatar
DodgeBoard President
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: LaMarque, Texas
Posts: 6,253
Casino Cash: $133158
Rep Power: 1071
TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!
TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!TexKan Is off the scale!
Oh Bubba...... you know I can't "math" my way out of anything. Not my strong point either....... was just too easy to add up to let it slide by. Still the issue us what is a "lighter shade of pale"????....... The GOP will say it was a "majority"....... the truth is nobody gets the "majority" vote....... cause the true majority of us don't vote....... I look at the whole picture and no matter how ya divide it up........... 48% never will be the major part of 100%. It's a damn good showing - no doubt but when you see only 30% cast a vote - they all lost to me - cause only a minority felt any of them were good enough to warrent going to the polls to begin with..... Politics = business as usual........... Personally I voted for Perot........ my kinda guy...... too bad everyone was so scared of him. Funny thing is - his predictions of the global market are a sad reality now..............
__________________
Kicked back in Texas - still payin those Kansas taxes......

The old believe everything, the middle aged suspect everything, the young know everything......... Oscar Wilde
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On






Add to Technorati Favorites

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5
Copyright DodgeBoard.com