Next Republican President???

[JayhawkMom]

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

Newt Gingrich - Winning the Future

I say....VOTE FOR NEWT!

Trading one idiotic administration for another...................

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by JayhawkMom

Trading one idiotic administration for another...................

Speaking of shame and disgrace...and trading one for another....the Clinton name sure pops up in my mind when you mention that.

[JayhawkMom]

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

Speaking of shame and disgrace...and trading one for another....the Clinton name sure pops up in my mind when you mention that.

Maybe so, but your boy Newt isn't any better........and yet you SUPPORT him!

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by JayhawkMom

Maybe so, but your boy Newt isn't any better........and yet you SUPPORT him!

I'm not going to go into the Clinton past again but by measure Newt has never had any rape allegations against him, been sued for sexual harrassment, held in contempt of court, disbarred from the U.S. Supreme court and state court or been impeached. Is he less than perfect? Of course..who isn't. He has some good idea's though and you should familiarize yourself with some of them. I'm not asking you to support him but you should at least be familiar with all the candidates...(yes he will be running)

[JayhawkMom]

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

I'm not going to go into the Clinton past again but by measure Newt has never had any rape allegations against him, been sued for sexual harrassment, held in contempt of court, disbarred from the U.S. Supreme court and state court or been impeached. Is he less than perfect? Of course..who isn't. He has some good idea's though and you should familiarize yourself with some of them. I'm not asking you to support him but you should at least be familiar with all the candidates...(yes he will be running)

Bad, is bad, no matter how you dress it up...........

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by JayhawkMom

Bad, is bad, no matter how you dress it up...........

WRONG....speeding is bad...and murder is bad. But they are different levels of bad.

[JayhawkMom]

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

WRONG....speeding is bad...and murder is bad. But they are different levels of bad.

BUT both are still WRONG!


Using one to justify the other......okay if that works for you. I'd rather have someone else, and will vote for someone else come election time.

[The Drifter]

If you vote for newt you're a hypocrit man. You bust clintons chops for doin the whole lewinsky thing and newt quit for the same things clinton did. I really hope you were kidding about Newt. If you vote for him i promise i will vote for al sharpton.

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

WRONG....speeding is bad...and murder is bad. But they are different levels of bad.

However, this is true.

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by The Drifter

If you vote for newt you're a hypocrit man. You bust clintons chops for doin the whole lewinsky thing and newt quit for the same things clinton did. I really hope you were kidding about Newt. If you vote for him i promise i will vote for al sharpton.

I figured Al would get your vote anyway....

[edit] Ethics charges
Gingrich was accused of hypocrisy and unethical behavior when he accepted a $4.5 million advance as part of a book deal, in light of his previous role in the investigation of Jim Wright. Following the accusations, Gingrich returned the advance.

Including charges related to the book deal, Democrats filed 84 ethics charges against Speaker Gingrich during his term, including claiming tax-exempt status for a college course run for political purposes and using the GOPAC political action committee as a slush fund; see Joseph Gaylord. All charges were eventually dropped following an investigation by the Republican-led House Ethics Committee. However, Gingrich admitted to unintentionally giving inaccurate information to the House Ethics Committee during the course of the investigation. The committee did not indict him on charges of intentional perjury.[11] The matter was settled when he agreed to reimburse the Committee $300,000 for the cost of prolonging the investigation. The payment was described as a "cost assessment" and not a fine by the Committee.[12] He also agreed to not "spin" the story in the media, but admit publicly to his transgressions.

[TexKan]

Aint nuthin a politician can't get with money........... any of em......... they are all idiots but they are the only idiots we got........... how come the really bad choices seem to rise to the top like cream?