![]() | ![]() |
| ||||||||
| Home | Forums | Register | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| In The News Discussion of current headlines and contraversial issues in the news. Political news should be posted in the Politics and Religion forum. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Immigration speech... SO what did everyone think? http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/15/D8HKHJG80.html I think he will get a small boost in the polls. I think that if he can get the House and Senate to follow through that most of these measures are good. I believe the Dems will throw up roadblocks every chance they get because they are not going to vote for anything that will make this country better as long as Bush is in office....watch and see.....
__________________ LIBERALISM The haunting fear someone, somewhere can help themselves. "Over the last fifteen months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states..." Barack Obama |
| I think it’s a lot of too little too late. The border has been ignored by both parties for decades. Bush did talk about doing something at first but Congress didn’t want any part of it. Tom Tancredo has been making lots of noise about securing the borders for years and he’s treated like a freak by most of the other politicians. The House Republicans have passed a bill for border security every year since 1997 and it gets killed in the Senate were Democrats can and do manage to block things they don’t like. Talking about any kind of amnesty at this point is a mistake. It just says hurry up and get here before the door slams shut.
__________________ ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Three groups spend other people's money: children, thieves, and politicians. All three need supervision. —DICK ARMEY Click here to view Democrat’s comments on Iraq and WMD’s |
| ||||
| Quote:
Scientific America expressed today's problems in 1869 within a short column titled "LABOR AND CAPITAL NOT ANTAGONISITC" http://cdl.library.cornell.edu/cgi-b...ames=1&view=75 It's not an easy read...
__________________ Quote:
"Wal-Mart, you may want to look into this." |
| ||||
| I agree with you guys. I'm afraid he's spreading our military wealth too thin. Then again, we're going to spend a certain amount of money for the rest of our lives to support illegal immigrants. We may as well spend it now to get them out and keep them out than to cry about it forever. I just don't want to burn our military. While the bennies are good for the retirees, we don't pay our enlisted guys nearly enough to survive. And we ask them to move all over the world, sometimes with families in tow.
__________________ When the goin' gets tough, the tough go shopping! |
| ||||
| I was pleased when I heard the speech........ disappointed when I found out what it meant. Kinda like when my kids would tell me they had passed a test - then found out it was with a D.............. I'm not feelin too good right now......... I think it's a place to start but it's like a piece of plastic for a sucking chest wound.......... it will sufice but sure as hell won't fix the problem.
__________________ Kicked back in Texas - still payin those Kansas taxes...... The old believe everything, the middle aged suspect everything, the young know everything......... Oscar Wilde |
| ||||
| I'm with ya. I found the speech lacking in substance and other than a few more guards on the boarder seems to be a repeat of 20 years ago. It didn't work then and it won't work now. Most depressing was the talk of amnesty. We don't need 12 million criminals becoming Americans even if they would assimilate. Send them to the back of the line(Mexico) behind the ones that are going through the legal process, which makes a better American, and let them start over. We can't deport 12 million Mexicans but we can make hiring them a felony and enforce it and that would drive them back on their own. We cannot reward criminal behavior. 20 years ago we did the same thing and now we have 20-30 million to deal with. Rewarding criminals only produces more criminals. "Up-to" 6000 guards is not going to make a difference especially since they can't do anything. Combining a bill of boarder control with amnesty is just stupid. Every one wants tighter boarders, the debate is over the amnesty. They need to separate the two and FIRST pass a bill on boarder control then on a separate ticket argue what to do with 12 million criminals. They know the only way they can get amnesty to pass is by tyeing it with boarder control. Bushes speech was a waste of 16 minutes.
__________________ The real treasure is in the hunt... Last edited by Detector; 05-16-2006 at 05:21 AM. |
| ||||
| Quote:
One source of many similar: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12816021/ |
| ||||
| He didn't offer any real solutions in his reading last night other than amnesty for illegals already here. The troops on the border aren't going to be effective as anything more than a smokescreen to draw controversay away from the fact that nothing real is being done. Here's what I'd like to see... We are putting troops on the border as active support to the border patrol. They will be there for more than 2 weeks so that they can actually get a grasp of what's heppening and what needs to be done. This is a stop gap measure only to buy us time while we quadruple the number of trained border patrol agents. Next we are going to impose a fine of $10,000 per violation for any company or person found to be employing illegal aliens in their busines and audits will begin immediately. Also we will bring full diplomatic pressure and begin immediate sanctions against trade with Mexico in order to gain their government's cooperation in protecting their side of the border. Anyone caught on this side of the U.S. border without proper documentation will be placed on the Mexico side of the border within 48 hours of their identification as an illegal alien. Just a few ideas off the top of my head.
__________________ "The Republican Party has shown beyond all doubt that it holds the U.S. Constitution in total contempt. Today, the Republican Party stands for unaccountable executive power. To re-elect such a party is to murder liberty in America." - Paul Roberts, formerAssistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration earning fame as the "Father of Reaganomics" Last edited by wordsmythe; 05-16-2006 at 01:08 PM. |
| ||||
| Those make sense, Wordie - I'm afraid our government's full attention has been turned from matters at hand to re-election strategies. Why don't you elevate those to a congressman that can make a difference?
__________________ When the goin' gets tough, the tough go shopping! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |

