Legal does not mean ethical.

[lurker]

Originally Posted by wordsmythe

Actually it greatly warms my heart to see that you guys have to fall back on this tactic more and more often.

It shows you really don't have anything and it does raise my hopes for November.

Keep ignoring current facts guys (insert Lurker's made up word heredna).

Ostrichnovalian does not apply there. However, I would read whatever "current facts" you might provide.

[Highwayman]

Originally Posted by wordsmythe

Actually it greatly warms my heart to see that you guys have to fall back on this tactic more and more often.

It shows you really don't have anything and it does raise my hopes for November.

Keep ignoring current facts guys (insert Lurker's made up word here).

It’s not so much falling back on a tactic as it is just being in the same old rut. You bash a Republican with something you find and I point out your heroes are guilty of the same thing. It just calls attention to the fact that you have no principles but instead are merely a political hack and a shrill for the far left.

As for ignoring facts, you stated quite well what we see you practice;

That doesn't support the position I want it to so it can't be true and I refuse to consider it.

Have a great day!

[Outofdodge]

Originally Posted by wordsmythe

It shows you really don't have anything and it does raise my hopes for November.

Raising hopes and reality alas become different things. The Rove machine is starting, get ready soon for the return of the terror alert d'jour

[Outofdodge]

Originally Posted by Highwayman

point out your heroes are guilty of the same thing. It just calls attention to the fact that you have no principles but instead are merely a political hack and a shrill for the far left.

while the similarities are noted, The operative fact is Gore WAS culpable in a similar vein as is this example from Kansas. As part of an overall appearance of arrogance Gore managed to blow what should have been a winnable election with help from a third party candidate made possible by the afforementioned arrogance. Therefore Gore was eventually held accountable for "no controlling legal authority"

Either the otherside serves to a higher standard as some would imply or they too choose to adopt the arrogant self serving behavior. It would appear in this case the latter has occurred and comparisons to a certain Democrat as a means for excusing the behavior is inappropriate at best and somewhat hypocritical. The article, at least what I read of it, does not state if the campaign paid the state for the names and/if the names are available to the opposition for a fee or some level of hoop hopping.

One can disagree, agree, or don't care about the behavior but to justify it on past.........sorry can't see it.

[Highwayman]

Originally Posted by Outofdodge

....One can disagree, agree, or don't care about the behavior but to justify it on past.........sorry can't see it.

I don’t believe I attempted to justify the behavior at all and I really think you are fully aware of my intent.