Clinton aides plant student's question

[Army_of_One]

Clinton aides plant student's question
By PATRICK CALDWELL
The Iowa caucuses are known for their “living-room chats” where ordinary Iowans can meet candidates face-to-face and talk about what interests voters. When candidates have larger events or make major policy speeches, the crowds are bigger, but there is often still an opportunity for questions. But under the pressures of major media coverage, with polls narrowing in Iowa, campaigns can potentially control questions and coverage by planning questions ahead of time.

While no campaigns admit to this practice, at a recent Hillary Clinton campaign event in Newton, Iowa, some of the questions posed to the New York Senator were planned in advance, planting some audience members in the crowd.

On Tuesday Nov. 6, the Clinton campaign stopped at a biodiesel plant in Newton as part of a weeklong series of events to introduce her new energy plan. The event was clearly intended to be as much about the press as the Iowa voters in attendance, as a large press core helped fill the small venue. Reporters from many major national news outlets came to the small Iowa town, from such media giants as The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, the Associated Press, and CNN.

After her speech, Clinton accepted questions. But according to Grinnell College student Muriel Gallo-Chasanoff ’10, some of the questions from the audience were planned in advance. “They were canned,” she said. Before the event began, a Clinton staff member approached Gallo-Chasanoff to ask a specific question after Clinton’s speech. “One of the senior staffers told me what [to ask],” she said.
Clinton called on Gallo-Chasanoff after her speech to ask a question: what Clinton would do to stop the effects of global warming. Clinton began her response by noting that young people often pose this question to her before delving into the benefits of her plan.

But the source of the question was no coincidence—at this event “they wanted a question from a college student,” Gallo-Chasanoff said. She also noted that staffers prompted Clinton to call on her and another who had been approached before the event, although Clinton used her discretion to select questions and called on people who had not been prepped before hand. Some of the questions asked were confusing and clearly off-message.

The practice of planting audience members to ask specific questions does not appear to be a common practice, or at least not a politically acceptable one. “Our campaign does not plant questions,” said Lauren Rose, Communications Director for Governor Bill Richardson’s campaign. When asked what she would think of other campaigns who did plant audience members, Rose said, “I think campaigns should give Iowa caucus-goers the chance to ask the questions they want.”

When asked if the John Edwards campaign employed such practices, Jenni Lee, Edwards’s Iowa Press Secretary said, “No, they ask whatever they want.”

But the Clinton campaign also denied the practice of planting. “It’s not a practice of our campaign to ask people to ask specific questions,” said Mark Daley, Clinton’s Iowa Communications Director. Daley said that when an event is focusing on a specific topic, such as health care or Iraq, “people are encouraged to ask questions in these regards,” but denied that they are given specific questions.

But when directly asked if his statements meant that planting does not occur in the Hillary campaign, Daley could only say, “to the best of my knowledge.”

“[Planting] is not something that is encouraged in our campaign,” he said.

The event in Newton was a particularly major policy speech, more informative than rallying. The campaign’s apparent tactics at this event may have little or no relationship with the questions at less formal campaign events.

Serving as a stark contrast to the Clinton event was Richardson’s campaign stop at Grinnell College the night before. Richardson’s appearance was designed as an opportunity for voters to interact with the candidate, and not the media event that Clinton held in Newton. In lower-profile events like Richardson’s (and most of Clinton’s) candidates face many challenging, presumably spontaneous questions.


Scarlet and Black | Grinnell College Newspaper

[Army_of_One]

This is how big Hillary rolls. She has been doing this for a long time. She controls as much of as much as she can. I guess it is important for her to have plants for questions after her last beating at the debate. See, she can't answer real questions from real people. I would like the people that support her talk about how they feel about this.

[wordsmythe]

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

This is how big Hillary rolls. She has been doing this for a long time. She controls as much of as much as she can. I guess it is important for her to have plants for questions after her last beating at the debate. See, she can't answer real questions from real people. I would like the people that support her talk about how they feel about this.

You voted for Bush...

You REALLY want to take issue with this?

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by wordsmythe

You voted for Bush...

You REALLY want to take issue with this?

So you have an example of where Bush has inserted someone asking him false questions during an election year?

[Highwayman]

It wouldn’t be so bad to have someone to ask a question about a topic if no one else brought it up. But recently someone ask a question that she didn’t like and she got all pissy and in his face accusing him of being a plant. that was worst IMO.

[Highwayman]

BTW, does this remind anyone of a FEMA press conference a couple weeks ago?

[lurker]

Have you noticed that "if it comes from Washington DC" it's usually/always/prolly less than truthful?

I don't see much difference between L/R sources, either.

[BroncoFan]

[Highwayman]

Flags try to run from Hillary. A sign from above?

YouTube Video