What??

[jeezeweeze]

Ok ...so let me get this right..

Super deligates are just the most wonderful thing and are so important.

Hillary.....would you make up your freaking mind. You are truly female... yikes !

In a statement Clinton shrugged off Richardson's(super deligate) endorsement of her rival, saying "both of us have many great endorsers, and the voters, not endorsers, will decide this election.

Bill Richardson to endorse Obama - CNN.com

WOULD SOME INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE THROW THEIR HAT INTO THE RING
PLEASE

where the hell is Ross Perot when you need him.......LOL

[Highwayman]

It’s really getting fun ain’t it!

Hillary is leading in the polls for Pennsylvania with 188 delegates and will probably take the lion’s share. If somehow Florida (remember count all the votes?) gets its votes counted she could close the gap by another 40.

It’s close and will go down to the wire. In the end it’s up to the super delegates who are party insiders. If enough of them feel that Obama is damaged goods after the dust clears from this weeks scandal (and it ain’t over yet), they might just hand the nomination to Hillary.

Howard Dean and the super delegates need to get together in that back room and settle this before the two camps tear each other apart. Of course, that might fracture the party. Then again, letting it go to the convention might split the party too.

What to do, what to do.

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by Highwayman

What to do, what to do.

If you are a Republican you sit back and watch the chaos. You sit back and watch them rip each other apart. You sit back and watch them disenfranchise voters in Florida and Michigan.

We sit back, crack open a beer and watch this happen....

Poll: Divisive Dem Contest Could Boost McCain -- 03/21/2008

The lengthy Democratic primary contest bodes well for Republican chances of holding the White House, a new poll suggests.

As Democratic Senators Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Clinton of New York slug it out for the nomination, many of their supporters -- at least in Pennsylvania, site of the next major primary -- aren't committed to the party's ticket in November, according to a Franklin & Marshall College Poll.

Among Obama supporters, 20 percent said they would vote for Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the Republican nominee, if Clinton beats their candidate for the nomination. Among Clinton supporters, 19 percent said they would support McCain in November if Obama is the Democratic nominee. (See poll)

[Army_of_One]

All that Big Daddy John McCain has to do is act presidential and stay out of the fray and let these two destroy each other. Unless Hillary does the noble thing and drops out of the race (doubt that since she will take Penns handily)they are going to probably go all the way and shred the party. OH well. Can we ruin our party and disenfranchise our voters?

YES WE CAN!!!

[Army_of_One]

Originally Posted by jeezeweeze

WOULD SOME INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE THROW THEIR HAT INTO THE RING
PLEASE

where the hell is Ross Perot when you need him.......LOL

Just a few short days ago you were bashing Republicans like they were lepers and singing the praise of BO and the Dem party. Now after a couple of news reports you seem to have left the camp. Where do you stand if I may ask? If you had to vote today how would you vote?

[Highwayman]

Originally Posted by Highwayman

It’s really getting fun ain’t it!

Originally Posted by Army_of_One

....We sit back, crack open a beer and watch this happen....

I’ve got your sideshow right here Army.

Time to Prepare to March on the Democratic Convention

by hilage
Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:37:18 PM PDT

After Senator Obama’s speech, I can say that there is no doubt remaining in my heart or mind that he should be the nominee of the Democratic Party. Unfortunately, the Clinton campaign remains committed to pursuing an "any means necessary" approach to the nomination. It seems to me that it is time to begin organizing in case a march on the Democratic Convention becomes necessary. Perhaps a petition with a million signatures or so would help convince the remaining uncommitted Superdelegates to see the light. In any case, I know I will, without doubt, march at the convention if there is even a remote chance on the nomination being stolen. To whit, I offer the following pledge as a first step in preparing ourselves if the unpleasant should become necessary. Perhaps an online page can be developed to organize the signatures. Please feel free to pass around the list via email or any other method. The more the merrier. Together, we can make a difference and make change.

Daily Kos: State of the Nation

Uh-oh.

In regards to your question about Colorado being a difficult state to poll, I would add another dimension that may render any recent polls there indeterminate of which way the state will go in November.

The Democrat convention is being held in Colorado the week before Labor Day weekend.

Regardless of whether the convention turns into a repeat of 1968, with filthy hippie war protesters camping out on the state capitol grounds and the large public park in front of the city and county buildings across Broadway Blvd. (which are, incidently, only about two blocks away from the Pepsi Center and big hotels the delegates will be staying at), the whole experience promises to be a circus and a fiasco the city of Denver has never seen in its history. The flawed nominating process this year will play no small role in this. That is assuming it doesn't turn into Los Angeles 2000 for the Democrats, in which case it will be something far worse for both the city (and its Democrat mayor) and the state (with a new, supposedly law and order Democrat Governor). Denver is not equipped to handle any convention scenario other than a coronation, and certainly not the most (potentially) contentious national convention in 40 years.


It is important to point out that the state of Colorado, and the city of Denver, is currently nearly completely controlled by Democrats at every level of government. This puts these locals in a box, politically and from a law enforcement standpoint. This sets up a scenario similar to Seattle 1999 WTO debacle. I happened to be living in downtown Seattle during that awful experience, and what stands out is that the city and state (even the Federal Government at that time) were all controlled by Democrats at every level, even police chief. That meant they were politically unwilling to confront their own in the days leading up to the summit: that is, the anti-globalism/WTO protestors, greenies, and union members that were planning major marches, civil disobedience, and even outright mischief.

The reason is simple, they didn't want to alienate their own constituencies by seeming too heavy handed. The result was that by the time they had to crackdown, it was too late and with police state tactics, water cannons, gas cannisters, police in riot gear, and dusk to dawn curfews on the streets. There is still a lot of these scenes on YouTube and many disenchanted lefties are promising a repeat in Denver this year. Any variation of this would be a potential public relations disaster for the Democrat nominee in trying to win Colorado, and one that would virtually ensure not only a McCain victory in the state, but a stigmatization that could likely lead to major setbacks for the Democrat party in Colorado for years to come.

The other important thing to remember is that Denver is not Los Angeles or Boston. It doesn't have the police force, crowd control capabilities, parking, traffic lanes, budget, and law enforcement infrastructure to deal with thousands of out-of-state protestors, let alone tens of thousands of them. When we had the riots here in Los Angeles during the 2000 Democrat convention they were dealt with swiftly by a police force that has extensive training in crowd control and riot suppression since the 1992 riots. As a result, they were relatively minor and able to be handled before Clinton and Gore got to town. There also wasn't a war in the Middle East, and a sitting Democrat Congress who the protestors expected to end it. We also had a (nominally) Republican lame duck mayor who wasn't at all worried about offending left-wing groups looking for attention at the convention.

Los Angeles and Boston are both international cities, so having tens of thousands of out-of-towners is part of daily life. Such is not the case with Denver. Most of the tourists flying into Denver International Airport end up leaving the metro area, staying and dining at accomodations in the mountain ski towns, not in the small, confined urban center of Denver.

Having lived in Denver, Seattle, and Los Angeles, I assure you Denver is a lot more like Seattle than it is Los Angeles. Perhaps the law enforcement officials and Democrat officeholders in Denver will rise to the occassion and find the magic formula to keep the city from breaking under the critical mass of the crush of media, Democrat delegates, liberal celebrities, left-wing activists, unions, and the teeming hordes of war protestors, but I would bet not.

At the end of the day, not only did the DNC make a hash of their nominating process, but they also chose a city that will be ill-equipped to deal with the convention circus to officially nominate the eventual candidate. Even the newly returning students for the fall semester from Boulder, Fort Collins, and the other assorted colleges in the area will be enough street activists in Denver to give the locals headaches that week.

The great irony is that the choice of Denver was a political calculation to show a state that had turned (in the minds of the party bosses) from red to blue. The end result will likely be to to turn the state back to red....

Anyone who puts much stock in Colorado polls showing Obama winning Colorado at this point should wait until the second week of September, it will likely not even end up being a state in play by then.

The Campaign Spot on National Review Online

[88-31-10]

What would be sweet is if old man McCain picked someone like Colin Powell for VP. He could likely be the main man in a heartbeat.

[jackknife]

I wish Colin Powell would run. I love him. I really respect him too.

[jeezeweeze]

McCain will need a VP "TO DIE FOR" so to speak. (no pun intended) and I would probably vote republican. Colin Powell is a good choice however I don't think he wants it...does he ?

Everyone knows how I feel about this damn war...so I have a problem with McCain... I don't want 4 more years of Bush.... dammit... I want Change... But I want that change to be for the better. Change is change... it could get worse.

YouTube - john.he.is

I think the Democrats will need a good VP also. I lean toward Democrats. I think you all know that. But for sure I don't like what I am seeing...

I do think there will be a conflict of biblical proportions in this country, if Obama doesn't get the nomination. If he does get it, there is gonna be so much mud slinging in the general election, America will be a laughing stock as a democratic nation.

I do want someone just like the person Obama says he is....I am just not convinced he is really a uniter.

Truth is .... I may not vote at all... in which case I will never get to bitch and moan on DB anymore, you lucky people you....lol

[jeezeweeze]

I gotta stay off of youtube..... wow

YouTube - Obama's Bra 54 Double "D"